Ranked #152 of 191 · scores higher than 19% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
22 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including FNF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its return on assets, which is weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a lower return on assets: weaker than 72% of peers. Return on assets: 0.7% vs peer median 1.2%
●Return on equity is close to the peer norm. Return on equity: 10.4% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FNF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
FNF
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 164 reported
15.7%
11.2%
69%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 22 reported
Not reported
13.6%
—
—
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 191 reported
0.7%
1.3%
17%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 189 reported
10.2%
12.3%
30%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 197 reported
54.0%
0.0%
81%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
