Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Fresenius Medical Care AG
How Fresenius Medical Care AG stacks up
FMS · against 146 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
61/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #68 of 147 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score8 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including FMS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 70% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 0.4% vs peer median 5.8%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 66% of peers. Revenue growth: 1.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 85% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 91.1% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FMS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FMS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 148 reported | 1.5% | 10.1% | 13% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 108 reported | 91.1% | 15.3% | 86% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 142 reported | 0.4% | 10.9% | 9% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FMS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 9.3B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 14.87T KRW (≈$10.7B) | 97 | 76 | |
| 3 | 21.4B USD | 97 | 67 | |
| 3 | 7.3B USD | 97 | 74 | |
| 64 | 12.6B USD | 67 | 65 | |
| 65 | 43.1B CNY (≈$6.0B) | 66 | 72 | |
| 66 | 9.3B USD | 65 | 29 | |
| 67 | 6.1B CHF (≈$7.0B) | 62 | 58 | |
| 68 | 11.6B USD | 61 | 58 | |
| 69 | 10.4B USD | 60 | 64 | |
| 70 | 47.8B HKD (≈$6.1B) | 59 | 58 | |
| 70 | 66.0B BRL (≈$11.9B) | 59 | 55 | |
| 70 | 69.1B BRL (≈$12.4B) | 59 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score