Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Fresenius Medical Care AG
How Fresenius Medical Care AG stacks up
FMS · against 454 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Growth
61/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #241 of 455 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score46 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including FMS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 70% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 0.4% vs peer median 5.8%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 66% of peers. Revenue growth: 1.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 85% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 91.1% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FMS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FMS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 475 reported | 1.5% | 11.0% | 25% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 171 reported | 91.1% | 21.2% | 79% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 433 reported | 0.4% | 11.0% | 21% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FMS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 90M USD | 99 | 27 | |
| 234 | 5.1B USD | 63 | 54 | |
| 234 | 1.6B USD | 63 | 24 | |
| 239 | 1.5B USD | 62 | 26 | |
| 239 | 221M USD | 62 | 33 | |
| 241 | 11.6B USD | 61 | 58 | |
| 241 | 4.3B USD | 61 | 54 | |
| 241 | 3.2B USD | 61 | 65 | |
| 241 | 1.6B USD | 61 | 51 | |
| 245 | 2.2B USD | 60 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score