Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
How Flexsteel Industries, Inc. stacks up
FLXS · against 453 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
84/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #87 of 454 · scores higher than 80% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score47 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including FLXS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 84?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 76% of peers. EBITDA yield: 13.9% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 80% of peers. Earnings yield: 11.1% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 83% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 15.9% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FLXS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FLXS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 442 reported | 8.3% | 3.2% | 80% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | 13.9% | 8.6% | 73% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 136 reported | 15.9% | 6.5% | 78% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 444 reported | 44.5% | 70.0% | 31% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FLXS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2.3B HKD (≈$296M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 4 | 3.2B HKD (≈$408M) | 99 | 79 | |
| 82 | 662M SGD (≈$503M) | 85 | 82 | |
| 87 | 3.0B CNY (≈$424M) | 84 | 53 | |
| 87 | 4.0B CNY (≈$557M) | 84 | 62 | |
| 87 | 27.6B JPY (≈$188M) | 84 | 81 | |
| 87 | 299M USD | 84 | 82 | |
| 87 | 363M GBP (≈$473M) | 84 | 51 | |
| 92 | 51.3B JPY (≈$349M) | 83 | 70 | |
| 92 | 7.3B TWD (≈$227M) | 83 | 62 | |
| 92 | 468M EUR (≈$514M) | 83 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score