Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
How Flexsteel Industries, Inc. stacks up
FLXS · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
82/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #75 of 356 · scores higher than 78% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score35 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including FLXS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 82?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.1% vs peer median 3.7%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.3% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 92% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 111.9% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FLXS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FLXS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 4.1% | 5.9% | 41% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | 111.9% | 6.2% | 90% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 5.3% | 4.1% | 55% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FLXS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 72 | 9.8B USD | 83 | 57 | |
| 72 | 414M USD | 83 | 36 | |
| 72 | 350M USD | 83 | 26 | |
| 75 | 1.8B USD | 82 | 29 | |
| 75 | 299M USD | 82 | 82 | |
| 75 | 707M USD | 82 | 74 | |
| 75 | 114.1B USD | 82 | 91 | |
| 79 | 4.0B USD | 81 | 62 | |
| 79 | 10.5B USD | 81 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score