Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Flowserve Corporation
How Flowserve Corporation stacks up
FLS · against 313 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
37/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #234 of 314 · scores higher than 24% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score46 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including FLS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 37?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 4.2% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.6% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.0% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FLS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FLS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 301 reported | 3.4% | 4.2% | 35% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 314 reported | 6.0% | 7.4% | 31% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 158 reported | 4.0% | 3.9% | 52% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 299 reported | 21.9% | 33.6% | 32% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FLS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 9.3B SGD (≈$7.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 49.8B HKD (≈$6.4B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82.6B NOK (≈$7.8B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 5 | 157.6B HKD (≈$20.2B) | 97 | 67 | |
| 231 | 8.5B USD | 38 | 21 | |
| 231 | 719.9B INR (≈$8.6B) | 38 | 67 | |
| 234 | 14.33T KRW (≈$10.3B) | 37 | 36 | |
| 234 | 10.4B USD | 37 | 67 | |
| 234 | 10.3B USD | 37 | 44 | |
| 234 | 368.8B MXN (≈$19.9B) | 37 | 48 | |
| 234 | 6.2B USD | 37 | 55 | |
| 234 | 6.0B USD | 37 | 66 | |
| 234 | 7.6B GBP (≈$9.9B) | 37 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score