Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FLOC · against 127 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #36 of 128 · scores higher than 72% of peers · safety percentile 77
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)12 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including FLOC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FLOC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 126 reported | 0.25× | 0.53× | 73% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 125 reported | Not reported | 0.47 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 127 reported | 2.67× | 1.61× | 77% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 2 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 3 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 99 | ||
| 4 | 1.2B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 5 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 50 | |
| 32 | 2.2B USD | 84 | 89 | |
| 33 | 4.1B SAR (≈$1.1B) | 78 | 61 | |
| 34 | 5.7B CAD (≈$4.1B) | 78 | 51 | |
| 35 | 3.4B USD | 78 | 62 | |
| 36 | 2.1B USD | 77 | 65 | |
| 37 | 3.3B AUD (≈$2.2B) | 77 | 34 | |
| 38 | 1.3B USD | 77 | 59 | |
| 39 | 5.1B CAD (≈$3.7B) | 76 | 73 | |
| 40 | 3.7B USD | 75 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score