Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Flex Ltd.
How Flex Ltd. stacks up
FLEX · against 118 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
56/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #59 of 119 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score17 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including FLEX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.5% vs peer median 2.7%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.0% vs peer median 2.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 61% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.7% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FLEX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FLEX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 119 reported | 2.9% | 3.2% | 46% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 116 reported | 6.0% | 5.0% | 60% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 84 reported | 3.2% | 3.1% | 51% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 113 reported | 16.9% | 17.0% | 48% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FLEX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B USD | 97 | 56 | |
| 2 | 1.42T TWD (≈$44.0B) | 95 | 75 | |
| 3 | 3.89T JPY (≈$26.5B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 3 | 20.1B USD | 94 | 68 | |
| 5 | 17.5B USD | 93 | 93 | |
| 55 | 143.1B HKD (≈$18.3B) | 60 | 64 | |
| 55 | 1.59T INR (≈$19.0B) | 60 | 67 | |
| 57 | 176.1B CNY (≈$24.7B) | 59 | 78 | |
| 58 | 52.7B USD | 57 | 61 | |
| 59 | 32.5B USD | 56 | 43 | |
| 59 | 20.2B USD | 56 | 50 | |
| 59 | 28.3B USD | 56 | 42 | |
| 59 | 30.8B USD | 56 | 59 | |
| 63 | 932.5B TWD (≈$28.9B) | 55 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score