Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Five9, Inc.
How Five9, Inc. stacks up
FIVN · against 433 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
58/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #172 of 434 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score52 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including FIVN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 1.9% vs peer median 2.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.4% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FIVN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FIVN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 428 reported | 1.9% | 2.4% | 44% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 438 reported | 5.3% | 4.5% | 57% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 172 reported | 6.4% | 3.4% | 73% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | 29.4% | 29.8% | 49% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FIVN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 167 | 1.4B GBP (≈$1.9B) | 59 | 61 | |
| 172 | 11.7B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 58 | 68 | |
| 172 | 3.2B USD | 58 | 64 | |
| 172 | 2.5B USD | 58 | 51 | |
| 172 | 2.7B USD | 58 | 48 | |
| 176 | 3.9B USD | 57 | 52 | |
| 177 | 19.6B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 56 | 50 | |
| 177 | 30.3B CNY (≈$4.2B) | 56 | 56 | |
| 177 | 1.9B SGD (≈$1.4B) | 56 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score