Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FIVE · against 155 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #105 of 156 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score21 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including FIVE · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | FIVE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 154 reported | 4.6% | 4.9% | 45% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 159 reported | 5.9% | 8.4% | 24% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 88 reported | 4.6% | 5.9% | 40% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 153 reported | 19.0% | 29.9% | 36% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 2 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 4 | 1.00T JPY (≈$6.8B) | 93 | 77 | |
| 5 | 70.6B CNY (≈$9.9B) | 92 | 52 | |
| 100 | 927.0B INR (≈$11.1B) | 41 | 70 | |
| 102 | 13.7B USD | 40 | 54 | |
| 103 | 7.7B USD | 39 | 42 | |
| 103 | 7.6B USD | 39 | 21 | |
| 105 | 13.0B USD | 37 | 68 | |
| 105 | 10.0B USD | 37 | 55 | |
| 107 | 75.5B CNY (≈$10.6B) | 36 | 56 | |
| 107 | 8.6B GBP (≈$11.1B) | 36 | 45 | |
| 107 | 23.5B USD | 36 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score