Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
How Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. stacks up
FIS · against 158 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
98/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #3 of 159 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score29 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including FIS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 98?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 73% of peers. Revenue growth: 18.3% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 84% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 18.5% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 99% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 2950.6% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FIS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FIS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 159 reported | 18.3% | 13.8% | 57% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 139 reported | 2950.6% | 22.0% | 97% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 157 reported | 18.5% | 9.6% | 71% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FIS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 835.6B TWD (≈$25.9B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 101.7B CNY (≈$14.2B) | 98 | 63 | |
| 3 | 983.8B TWD (≈$30.5B) | 98 | 65 | |
| 3 | 23.2B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 3 | 20.1B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 3 | 13.3B USD | 98 | 50 | |
| 9 | 20.6B USD | 97 | 72 | |
| 9 | 11.9B USD | 97 | 50 | |
| 11 | 82.1B CNY (≈$11.5B) | 96 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score