Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Figma, Inc.
How Figma, Inc. stacks up
FIG · against 218 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
70/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #88 of 219 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score25 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including FIG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 70?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 92% of peers. Revenue growth: 43.4% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FIG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FIG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 221 reported | 43.4% | 12.8% | 93% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 179 reported | Not reported | 18.2% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 216 reported | Not reported | 9.9% | — | — | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FIG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 83 | |
| 2 | 101.7B CNY (≈$14.2B) | 98 | 63 | |
| 2 | 20.1B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 2 | 13.3B USD | 98 | 50 | |
| 5 | 9.5B USD | 97 | 56 | |
| 85 | 7.9B USD | 72 | 73 | |
| 87 | 8.5B EUR (≈$9.3B) | 71 | 61 | |
| 88 | 92.1B CNY (≈$12.9B) | 70 | 51 | |
| 88 | 17.07T KRW (≈$12.3B) | 70 | 62 | |
| 88 | 11.2B USD | 70 | 42 | |
| 88 | 13.9B USD | 70 | 50 | |
| 92 | 53.0B CNY (≈$7.4B) | 69 | 50 | |
| 92 | 9.6B USD | 69 | 75 | |
| 92 | 6.5B USD | 69 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score