Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FHTX · against 139 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #133 of 140 · scores higher than 5% of peers · safety percentile 2
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)19 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including FHTX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FHTX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 124 reported | Not reported | 0.23× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 134 reported | 3.01 | 0.64 | 1% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 137 reported | 3.36× | 2.94× | 57% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 165M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 3 | 284M AUD (≈$188M) | 98 | 36 | |
| 4 | 213M USD | 98 | ||
| 5 | 5.7B TWD (≈$177M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 129 | 107M USD | 3 | 31 | |
| 130 | 198M USD | 3 | 10 | |
| 131 | 115M USD | 2 | 8 | |
| 132 | 649M SEK (≈$65M) | 2 | 29 | |
| 133 | 126M USD | 2 | 32 | |
| 134 | 118M USD | 2 | 13 | |
| 135 | 110M USD | 2 | 38 | |
| 136 | 90M USD | 2 | 27 | |
| 137 | 253M USD | 1 | 15 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score