Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Federated Hermes, Inc.
How Federated Hermes, Inc. stacks up
FHI · against 75 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #37 of 76 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score8 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including FHI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 7.2% vs peer median 10.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 64% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 17.9% vs peer median 10.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 65% of peers. Revenue growth: 15.0% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FHI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FHI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 78 reported | 15.0% | 10.4% | 56% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 65 reported | 17.9% | 10.2% | 69% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 73 reported | 7.2% | 12.0% | 33% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FHI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23.7B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 59 | |
| 2 | 45.3B HKD (≈$5.8B) | 95 | 40 | |
| 3 | 5.7B EUR (≈$6.3B) | 94 | 50 | |
| 3 | 3.0B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 5 | 230.3B INR (≈$2.8B) | 92 | ||
| 33 | 6.5B USD | 63 | 48 | |
| 34 | 34.4B CNY (≈$4.8B) | 61 | 40 | |
| 35 | 289.5B INR (≈$3.5B) | 58 | ||
| 35 | 511.1B INR (≈$6.1B) | 58 | ||
| 37 | 4.6B USD | 54 | 70 | |
| 38 | 8.9B USD | 53 | 50 | |
| 39 | 323.2B INR (≈$3.9B) | 52 | 58 | |
| 39 | 6.7B CHF (≈$7.7B) | 52 | 54 | |
| 41 | 4.2B USD | 51 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score