Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Federated Hermes, Inc.
How Federated Hermes, Inc. stacks up
FHI · against 153 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Growth
54/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #83 of 154 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score15 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including FHI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 7.2% vs peer median 10.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 64% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 17.9% vs peer median 10.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 65% of peers. Revenue growth: 15.0% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FHI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FHI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 179 reported | 15.0% | 10.5% | 60% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 131 reported | 17.9% | 11.4% | 61% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 138 reported | 7.2% | 11.5% | 32% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FHI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 601M USD | 98 | 72 | |
| 3 | 843M USD | 98 | ||
| 5 | 282M USD | 97 | ||
| 78 | 137.4B USD | 59 | 50 | |
| 80 | 405M USD | 58 | 57 | |
| 81 | 46.6B USD | 55 | 40 | |
| 81 | 789.3B USD | 55 | 52 | |
| 83 | 4.6B USD | 54 | 70 | |
| 83 | 1.2B USD | 54 | 60 | |
| 85 | 218.3B USD | 53 | 50 | |
| 85 | 8.9B USD | 53 | 50 | |
| 87 | 49.8B USD | 52 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score