Ranked #82 of 256 · scores higher than 66% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
33 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including FHB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 65?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly thanks to its book yield, which is stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
●Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 9.1% vs peer median 7.9%
▲a lower price relative to book value (P/B): stronger than 62% of peers. Book yield: 90.3% vs peer median 79.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FHB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
FHB
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 262 reported
8.8%
7.8%
64%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 58 reported
Not reported
10.6%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 147 reported
10.1%
8.7%
60%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 256 reported
91.2%
81.1%
60%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
