Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FET · against 108 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #35 of 109 · scores higher than 69% of peers · safety percentile 69
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)13 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including FET · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FET | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 103 reported | 0.79× | 0.55× | 38% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 107 reported | 0.68 | 0.38 | 28% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 109 reported | 2.19× | 1.40× | 76% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 3 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 99 | ||
| 4 | 1.2B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 5 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 50 | |
| 31 | 455M EUR (≈$500M) | 72 | 31 | |
| 32 | 2.1B AUD (≈$1.4B) | 71 | 68 | |
| 33 | 1.5B EUR (≈$1.7B) | 70 | 69 | |
| 34 | 596M USD | 69 | 34 | |
| 35 | 883M USD | 69 | 42 | |
| 36 | 9.34T IDR (≈$579M) | 66 | 41 | |
| 37 | 1.5B USD | 66 | 51 | |
| 38 | 1.2B AUD (≈$767M) | 66 | 60 | |
| 39 | 534M USD | 64 | 24 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score