Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FERG · against 114 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #61 of 115 · scores higher than 47% of peers · safety percentile 28
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)18 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including FERG · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FERG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 110 reported | 1.11× | 0.61× | 25% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 114 reported | 1.12 | 0.87 | 27% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 114 reported | 1.73× | 1.25× | 76% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.91T JPY (≈$26.6B) | 95 | 70 | |
| 2 | 28.8B USD | 94 | 73 | |
| 3 | 60.0B USD | 92 | 71 | |
| 4 | 53.7B USD | 89 | 56 | |
| 5 | 34.8B USD | 89 | 49 | |
| 57 | 49.3B USD | 29 | 51 | |
| 58 | 453.2B SEK (≈$45.3B) | 29 | 50 | |
| 59 | 436.1B SEK (≈$43.6B) | 29 | 50 | |
| 60 | 247.0B HKD (≈$31.6B) | 28 | 43 | |
| 61 | 46.8B USD | 28 | 52 | |
| 62 | 6.21T JPY (≈$42.2B) | 27 | 53 | |
| 63 | 89.0B USD | 27 | 58 | |
| 64 | 38.07T KRW (≈$27.4B) | 26 | 58 | |
| 65 | 45.2B USD | 24 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score