Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ferguson Enterprises Inc.
How Ferguson Enterprises Inc. stacks up
FERG · against 114 other Industrials companies of similar size
Profitability
86/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #41 of 115 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score18 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including FERG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 86?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 8.9% vs peer median 7.7%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 87% of peers. Return on invested capital: 20.7% vs peer median 7.1%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 94% of peers. Return on assets: 10.4% vs peer median 3.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FERG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FERG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 110 reported | 20.7% | 14.2% | 69% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 116 reported | 8.9% | 14.2% | 27% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 113 reported | 10.4% | 5.8% | 79% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 108 reported | Not reported | 17.4% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 116 reported | 30.6% | 36.0% | 37% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FERG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.78T INR (≈$33.3B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 25.6B USD | 100 | 50 | |
| 3 | 60.0B USD | 99 | 71 | |
| 3 | 81.6B USD | 99 | 46 | |
| 3 | 68.5B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 39 | 191.7B CNY (≈$26.8B) | 89 | 72 | |
| 40 | 5.22T JPY (≈$35.5B) | 88 | 59 | |
| 41 | 3.91T JPY (≈$26.6B) | 86 | 70 | |
| 41 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 86 | 56 | |
| 41 | 46.8B USD | 86 | 52 | |
| 41 | 76.6B USD | 86 | 42 | |
| 45 | 24.6B USD | 85 | 49 | |
| 45 | 453.2B SEK (≈$45.3B) | 85 | 50 | |
| 47 | 23.7B USD | 84 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score