Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ferrovial N.V.
How Ferrovial N.V. stacks up
FER · against 123 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
23/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #114 of 124 · scores higher than 8% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score18 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including FER · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 23?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 73% of peers. EBITDA yield: 3.6% vs peer median 6.9%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 70% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.2% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FER, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FER | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 121 reported | 1.7% | 3.4% | 8% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 124 reported | 3.6% | 5.6% | 16% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 70 reported | Not reported | 3.5% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 119 reported | 16.2% | 21.2% | 36% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FER| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.8B EUR (≈$24.0B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 34.8B USD | 89 | 52 | |
| 3 | 271.0B CNY (≈$37.9B) | 88 | 58 | |
| 4 | 60.0B EUR (≈$66.0B) | 83 | 54 | |
| 5 | 259.3B HKD (≈$33.2B) | 82 | 53 | |
| 108 | 3.32T INR (≈$39.8B) | 26 | 53 | |
| 108 | 22.7B USD | 26 | 41 | |
| 112 | 47.2B USD | 25 | 65 | |
| 113 | 354.4B SEK (≈$35.4B) | 24 | 58 | |
| 114 | 41.4B USD | 23 | 27 | |
| 115 | 33.36T KRW (≈$24.0B) | 22 | 25 | |
| 115 | 35.5B USD | 22 | 58 | |
| 115 | 44.2B AUD (≈$29.2B) | 22 | 46 | |
| 118 | 22.4B USD | 20 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score