Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FELE · against 496 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #140 of 497 · scores higher than 72% of peers · safety percentile 62
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)45 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including FELE · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio and debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FELE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 490 reported | 0.22× | 0.49× | 74% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 481 reported | 1.02 | 0.75 | 31% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 475 reported | 2.41× | 1.55× | 79% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.5B USD | 100 | 33 | |
| 2 | 5.7B USD | 99 | 36 | |
| 3 | 350.8B JPY (≈$2.4B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 4 | 28.9B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 5 | 2.45T CLP (≈$2.7B) | 99 | ||
| 136 | 450.3B JPY (≈$3.1B) | 62 | 58 | |
| 137 | 347.5B JPY (≈$2.4B) | 62 | 55 | |
| 138 | 23.2B HKD (≈$3.0B) | 62 | 44 | |
| 139 | 3.4B AUD (≈$2.3B) | 62 | 42 | |
| 140 | 4.5B USD | 62 | 58 | |
| 141 | 29.4B CNY (≈$4.1B) | 62 | 65 | |
| 142 | 18.2B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 62 | 58 | |
| 143 | 426.2B JPY (≈$2.9B) | 61 | 60 | |
| 144 | 3.5B USD | 61 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score