Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to FedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc.
How FedEx Freight Holding Company, Inc. stacks up
FDXF · against 209 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
31/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #172 of 210 · scores higher than 16% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score40 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including FDXF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 31?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -1.1% vs peer median 3.7%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.4% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.4% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FDXF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FDXF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 199 reported | 3.4% | 3.9% | 40% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 210 reported | 3.9% | 6.6% | 15% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 105 reported | Not reported | 3.7% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 196 reported | -2.6% | 25.2% | 1% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FDXF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 21.8B EUR (≈$24.0B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 3 | 157.6B HKD (≈$20.2B) | 97 | 67 | |
| 3 | 91.3B HKD (≈$11.7B) | 97 | 73 | |
| 5 | 12.69T CLP (≈$14.0B) | 94 | 64 | |
| 169 | 12.1B USD | 32 | 56 | |
| 169 | 13.1B GBP (≈$17.1B) | 32 | 63 | |
| 169 | 22.4B USD | 32 | 38 | |
| 172 | 11.2B USD | 31 | 55 | |
| 172 | 19.5B USD | 31 | 30 | |
| 172 | 23.4B EUR (≈$25.7B) | 31 | 24 | |
| 172 | 18.4B USD | 31 | 46 | |
| 172 | 148.2B SEK (≈$14.8B) | 31 | 41 | |
| 172 | 206.3B BRL (≈$37.1B) | 31 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score