Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FDXF · against 208 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #209 of 209 · scores higher than 0% of peers · safety percentile 2
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)27 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including FDXF · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FDXF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 205 reported | Not reported | 0.51× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 205 reported | Not reported | 0.85 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 205 reported | 1.52× | 1.44× | 53% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.4B USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 3.91T JPY (≈$26.6B) | 95 | 70 | |
| 3 | 1.44T JPY (≈$9.8B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 4 | 28.8B USD | 94 | 73 | |
| 5 | 21.93T KRW (≈$15.8B) | 93 | 59 | |
| 205 | 24.5B EUR (≈$26.9B) | 3 | 37 | |
| 206 | 12.69T CLP (≈$14.0B) | 3 | 64 | |
| 207 | 1.94T INR (≈$23.3B) | 3 | 43 | |
| 208 | 10.8B USD | 3 | 39 | |
| 209 | 19.5B USD | 2 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score