Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to FTI Consulting, Inc.
How FTI Consulting, Inc. stacks up
FCN · against 445 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
61/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #211 of 446 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score56 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including FCN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.1% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 61% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 6.8% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 65% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 18.6% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FCN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FCN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 447 reported | 7.1% | 6.5% | 52% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 390 reported | 18.6% | 8.6% | 65% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 441 reported | 6.8% | 6.6% | 53% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FCN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 4 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 4 | 6.1B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 205 | 3.9B USD | 62 | 71 | |
| 205 | 3.5B USD | 62 | 63 | |
| 205 | 3.3B USD | 62 | 57 | |
| 205 | 4.0B USD | 62 | 69 | |
| 211 | 5.3B USD | 61 | 60 | |
| 211 | 5.1B USD | 61 | 53 | |
| 211 | 103.1B TRY (≈$3.1B) | 61 | 46 | |
| 214 | 14.33T KRW (≈$10.3B) | 60 | 36 | |
| 214 | 985.6B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 60 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score