Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FBNC · against 237 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #68 of 238 · scores higher than 71% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score19 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including FBNC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | FBNC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 264 reported | -3.6% | 9.4% | 10% | Context only | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 234 reported | 37.4% | 18.5% | 72% | 100% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 259 reported | 57.1% | 7.7% | 96% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34.9B HKD (≈$4.5B) | 95 | ||
| 1 | 28.2B HKD (≈$3.6B) | 95 | 50 | |
| 1 | 20.3B CNY (≈$2.8B) | 95 | 54 | |
| 1 | 21.1B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 95 | 61 | |
| 1 | 2.4B USD | 95 | 71 | |
| 65 | 306.6B JPY (≈$2.1B) | 76 | 51 | |
| 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 288.8B JPY (≈$2.0B) |
| 76 |
| 52 |
| 65 | 2.8B USD | 76 | 59 |
| 68 | 9.1B SAR (≈$2.4B) | 75 | 56 |
| 68 | 2.7B USD | 75 | 43 |
| 70 | 257.9B INR (≈$3.1B) | 74 |
| 71 | 3.0B USD | 73 | 65 |
| 72 | 3.1B GBP (≈$4.1B) | 72 |
| 72 | 3.8B USD | 72 | 59 |