Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to EyePoint, Inc.
How EyePoint, Inc. stacks up
EYPT · against 29 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #27 of 30 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score8 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including EYPT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 99% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -57.9% vs peer median 5.8%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 99% of peers. Revenue growth: -94.6% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EYPT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EYPT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 32 reported | -94.6% | 0.9% | 3% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 3 reported | Not reported | -6.2% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 29 reported | -57.9% | -1.6% | 4% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EYPT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 649M SEK (≈$65M) | 99 | 29 | |
| 2 | 298M SEK (≈$30M) | 94 | 48 | |
| 3 | 276M SEK (≈$28M) | 93 | 48 | |
| 4 | 250M SEK (≈$25M) | 92 | 44 | |
| 5 | 211M MYR (≈$46M) | 90 | 65 | |
| 25 | 429M HKD (≈$55M) | 4 | 20 | |
| 26 | 390.5B IDR (≈$24M) | 2 | 8 | |
| 27 | 64.3B KRW (≈$46M) | 0 | 24 | |
| 27 | 3.4B JPY (≈$23M) | 0 | 5 | |
| 27 | 34M USD | 0 | 19 | |
| 27 | 17M USD | 0 | 10 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score