Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
How Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. stacks up
EXPD · against 165 other Industrials companies of similar size
Profitability
96/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #20 of 166 · scores higher than 85% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score46 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including EXPD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 96?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 9.8% vs peer median 7.7%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 99% of peers. Return on assets: 17.9% vs peer median 3.1%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 99% of peers. Return on invested capital: 86.0% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EXPD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EXPD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 157 reported | 86.0% | 12.5% | 98% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 167 reported | 9.8% | 13.3% | 36% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 161 reported | 17.9% | 5.2% | 98% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 156 reported | 42.7% | 15.6% | 93% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 167 reported | 13.5% | 32.0% | 4% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EXPD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.78T INR (≈$33.3B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 25.6B USD | 100 | 50 | |
| 3 | 1.29T INR (≈$15.5B) | 99 | 69 | |
| 4 | 116.2B CNY (≈$16.3B) | 98 | 71 | |
| 4 | 45.2B USD | 98 | 47 | |
| 11 | 16.2B USD | 97 | 66 | |
| 20 | 157.0B CNY (≈$22.0B) | 96 | 79 | |
| 20 | 14.7B USD | 96 | 71 | |
| 20 | 31.2B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 20 | 26.6B USD | 96 | 55 | |
| 20 | 18.7B USD | 96 | 71 | |
| 20 | 28.4B USD | 96 | 55 | |
| 26 | 15.4B USD | 95 | 54 | |
| 26 | 20.6B USD | 95 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score