Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
How Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. stacks up
EXPD · against 163 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #115 of 164 · scores higher than 30% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score25 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including EXPD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 74% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -1.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.5% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.8% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EXPD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EXPD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 165 reported | 6.8% | 7.2% | 48% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 146 reported | 12.5% | 10.4% | 55% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 163 reported | -1.6% | 6.4% | 14% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EXPD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.22T INR (≈$14.6B) | 99 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.39T INR (≈$16.7B) | 97 | 54 | |
| 3 | 22.7B USD | 96 | 41 | |
| 4 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 4 | 20.6B USD | 95 | 61 | |
| 111 | 126.9B HKD (≈$16.2B) | 46 | 68 | |
| 111 | 436.1B SEK (≈$43.6B) | 46 | 50 | |
| 111 | 21.1B USD | 46 | 50 | |
| 111 | 29.2B USD | 46 | 50 | |
| 115 | 26.6B USD | 45 | 55 | |
| 116 | 140.3B CNY (≈$19.6B) | 44 | 44 | |
| 116 | 5.51T JPY (≈$37.5B) | 44 | 58 | |
| 116 | 28.8B USD | 44 | 73 | |
| 116 | 20.3B CHF (≈$23.4B) | 44 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score