Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Eagle Materials Inc.
How Eagle Materials Inc. stacks up
EXP · against 230 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #160 of 231 · scores higher than 30% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score21 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including EXP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 65% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -6.0% vs peer median 9.4%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.7% vs peer median 3.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.0% vs peer median -0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EXP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EXP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 232 reported | 1.7% | 9.4% | 29% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 186 reported | -6.0% | 14.2% | 29% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 229 reported | 2.0% | 3.5% | 46% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EXP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64.1B CNY (≈$9.0B) | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 97.93T IDR (≈$6.1B) | 100 | 47 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 4.2B CAD (≈$3.0B) | 99 | 74 | |
| 4 | 11.9B CAD (≈$8.7B) | 99 | 80 | |
| 157 | 4.9B EUR (≈$5.3B) | 46 | 69 | |
| 157 | 964.1B INR (≈$11.6B) | 46 | 74 | |
| 160 | 56.1B CNY (≈$7.9B) | 45 | 66 | |
| 160 | 49.5B CNY (≈$6.9B) | 45 | 70 | |
| 160 | 5.9B USD | 45 | 53 | |
| 160 | 3.6B EUR (≈$3.9B) | 45 | 61 | |
| 164 | 25.3B CNY (≈$3.5B) | 44 | 60 | |
| 164 | 506.8B INR (≈$6.1B) | 44 | 45 | |
| 164 | 2.8B EUR (≈$3.1B) | 44 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score