Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Expand Energy Corporation
How Expand Energy Corporation stacks up
EXE · against 47 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
88/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #3 of 48 · scores higher than 91% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score11 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including EXE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 88?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 79% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 12.9% vs peer median 6.2%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 85% of peers. Earnings yield: 13.4% vs peer median 5.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 91% of peers. EBITDA yield: 27.7% vs peer median 12.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EXE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EXE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 50 reported | 12.9% | 7.4% | 90% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 46 reported | 28.1% | 15.0% | 96% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 31 reported | 11.9% | 6.6% | 80% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 44 reported | 92.1% | 50.9% | 86% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EXE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 571.7B THB (≈$16.0B) | 95 | 62 | |
| 2 | 229.8B NOK (≈$21.8B) | 89 | 55 | |
| 3 | 16.7B USD | 88 | 70 | |
| 3 | 20.8B USD | 88 | 83 | |
| 3 | 1.96T INR (≈$23.5B) | 88 | 70 | |
| 6 | 2.92T INR (≈$35.0B) | 86 | 56 | |
| 7 | 1.78T JPY (≈$12.1B) | 85 | 58 | |
| 8 | 3.73T JPY (≈$25.4B) | 84 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score