Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Evotec SE
How Evotec SE stacks up
EVO · against 472 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #305 of 473 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score169 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including EVO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -10.6% vs peer median 1.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -8.3% vs peer median 0.0%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -14.8% vs peer median 4.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EVO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EVO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 460 reported | Not reported | 0.5% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 478 reported | -14.8% | 3.6% | 16% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 200 reported | -35.8% | -5.3% | 6% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 470 reported | 167.5% | 47.5% | 96% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EVO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 89.9B JPY (≈$611M) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 3.1B HKD (≈$396M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.50T IDR (≈$403M) | 99 | 69 | |
| 305 | 530M USD | 8 | 23 | |
| 305 | 487M USD | 8 | 29 | |
| 305 | 455M USD | 8 | 36 | |
| 305 | 486M USD | 8 | 16 | |
| 305 | 551M USD | 8 | 27 | |
| 305 | 508M EUR (≈$559M) | 8 | 21 | |
| 305 | 660M USD | 8 | 43 | |
| 305 | 375M USD | 8 | 46 | |
| 305 | 533M USD | 8 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score