Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust
How Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust stacks up
EVN · against 161 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
35/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #108 of 162 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score17 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including EVN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital, which is weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 66% of peers. Return on invested capital: 3.2% vs peer median 6.3%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 2.6% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EVN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EVN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 157 reported | 3.2% | 7.1% | 26% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 84 reported | Not reported | 23.1% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 183 reported | 2.6% | 2.6% | 51% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 176 reported | 8.6% | 10.4% | 45% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 200 reported | 100.0% | 83.0% | 57% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EVN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 566.9B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 2 | 2.7B USD | 98 | 63 | |
| 2 | 31.1B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 4 | 4.2B USD | 97 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2.7B USD | 97 | 58 | |
| 101 | 371M USD | 38 | ||
| 105 | 371M USD | 37 | ||
| 106 | 15.9B USD | 36 | 53 | |
| 106 | 499M USD | 36 | ||
| 108 | 402M USD | 35 | ||
| 108 | 322M USD | 35 | ||
| 108 | 6.5B USD | 35 | 48 | |
| 111 | 16.4B USD | 34 | 54 | |
| 111 | 458M USD | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score