Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.
How Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. stacks up
EVLV · against 941 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
9/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #829 of 942 · scores higher than 9% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score114 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including EVLV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 9?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -1.1% vs peer median 6.9%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.6% vs peer median 3.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -0.7% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EVLV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EVLV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 943 reported | -0.6% | 3.8% | 18% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 953 reported | -0.3% | 7.1% | 11% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 204 reported | -0.7% | 3.5% | 27% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 946 reported | 14.2% | 55.0% | 7% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EVLV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 895M EUR (≈$985M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 829 | 15.5B TRY (≈$464M) | 9 | ||
| 829 | 645M USD | 9 | 31 | |
| 829 | 687M USD | 9 | 28 | |
| 829 | 533M USD | 9 | 9 | |
| 829 | 833M USD | 9 | 32 | |
| 829 | 455M USD | 9 | ||
| 829 | 896M USD | 9 | 34 | |
| 829 | 461M USD | 9 | ||
| 829 | 1.4B USD | 9 | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score