Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to EverQuote, Inc.
How EverQuote, Inc. stacks up
EVER · against 146 other Communication Services companies listed in US-listed
Growth
97/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #7 of 147 · scores higher than 95% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including EVER · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 97?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 89% of peers. Revenue growth: 22.7% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 91% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 198.9% vs peer median 8.8%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 93% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 27.0% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EVER, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EVER | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 149 reported | 22.7% | 5.8% | 89% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 78 reported | 198.9% | 9.4% | 90% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 145 reported | 27.0% | 4.7% | 90% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EVER| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.5B USD | 100 | 81 | |
| 2 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 71 | |
| 2 | 35.4B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 4 | 648M USD | 98 | 26 | |
| 4 | 639M USD | 98 | 46 | |
| 4 | 41.2B USD | 98 | 39 | |
| 7 | 82.5B USD | 97 | 70 | |
| 7 | 1.0B USD | 97 | 87 | |
| 7 | 18.0B USD | 97 | 71 | |
| 10 | 803M USD | 96 | 65 | |
| 11 | 3.2B USD | 95 | 57 | |
| 12 | 1.9B USD | 94 | 79 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score