Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Entravision Communications Corporation
How Entravision Communications Corporation stacks up
EVC · against 142 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Growth
98/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #3 of 143 · scores higher than 98% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score16 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including EVC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 98?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 8.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 98% of peers. Revenue growth: 71.4% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 100% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 144.5% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EVC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EVC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 144 reported | 71.4% | 2.5% | 97% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 68 reported | Not reported | 5.2% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 141 reported | 144.5% | 2.9% | 100% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EVC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.62T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 1 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 71 | |
| 3 | 648M USD | 98 | 26 | |
| 3 | 639M USD | 98 | 46 | |
| 5 | 4.2B HKD (≈$540M) | 97 | 68 | |
| 5 | 1.0B USD | 97 | 87 | |
| 5 | 4.4B SEK (≈$437M) | 97 | 62 | |
| 8 | 1.24T KRW (≈$892M) | 96 | 87 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score