Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ethan Allen Interiors Inc.
How Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. stacks up
ETD · against 604 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
70/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #182 of 605 · scores higher than 70% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score63 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including ETD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 70?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 61% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.1% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 69% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 77% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.8% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ETD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ETD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 598 reported | 7.7% | 3.3% | 78% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 616 reported | 12.3% | 8.3% | 69% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 155 reported | 8.1% | 7.4% | 53% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 599 reported | 92.4% | 62.2% | 68% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ETD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2.3B HKD (≈$296M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 4 | 3.2B HKD (≈$408M) | 99 | 79 | |
| 174 | 119.2B JPY (≈$810M) | 71 | 47 | |
| 174 | 10.7B TWD (≈$333M) | 71 | 53 | |
| 174 | 805M EUR (≈$886M) | 71 | 64 | |
| 182 | 616M EUR (≈$678M) | 70 | 40 | |
| 182 | 511M USD | 70 | 50 | |
| 182 | 243M EUR (≈$267M) | 70 | 41 | |
| 185 | 3.0B CNY (≈$423M) | 69 | 69 | |
| 185 | 108.4B JPY (≈$737M) | 69 | 53 | |
| 185 | 78.5B JPY (≈$533M) | 69 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score