Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ESEA · against 900 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #95 of 901 · scores higher than 90% of peers · safety percentile 93
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)140 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including ESEA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ESEA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 863 reported | 0.39× | 0.32× | 45% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 870 reported | 0.82 | 0.51 | 21% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 889 reported | 5.46× | 1.79× | 94% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 79.5B JPY (≈$540M) | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 105.3B JPY (≈$716M) | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 402M USD | 100 | 39 | |
| 5 | 5.5B CNY (≈$769M) | 100 | 83 | |
| 91 | 116.4B JPY (≈$791M) | 94 | 73 | |
| 92 | 124.1B JPY (≈$844M) | 94 | 84 | |
| 93 | 74.8B JPY (≈$509M) | 94 | 66 | |
| 94 | 130.2B JPY (≈$885M) | 93 | 80 | |
| 95 | 462M USD | 93 | 86 | |
| 96 | 3.6B CNY (≈$499M) | 93 | 49 | |
| 97 | 4.1B CNY (≈$580M) | 93 | 47 | |
| 98 | 7.8B TWD (≈$240M) | 93 | 52 | |
| 99 | 3.4B CNY (≈$478M) | 93 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score