Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Euroseas Ltd.
How Euroseas Ltd. stacks up
ESEA · against 892 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
55/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #344 of 893 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score77 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including ESEA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 13.6% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 67% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 8.3% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ESEA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ESEA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 900 reported | 2.5% | 2.3% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 574 reported | 13.6% | 3.9% | 60% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 889 reported | 8.3% | 2.7% | 71% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ESEA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 6.6B NOK (≈$625M) | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 518M EUR (≈$570M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 5 | 1.9B CNY (≈$268M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 344 | 3.0B CNY (≈$414M) | 55 | 27 | |
| 344 | 4.4B CNY (≈$613M) | 55 | 46 | |
| 344 | 87.8B JPY (≈$597M) | 55 | 73 | |
| 344 | 65.7B JPY (≈$446M) | 55 | 74 | |
| 344 | 462M USD | 55 | 86 | |
| 344 | 773M AUD (≈$510M) | 55 | 73 | |
| 344 | 402M USD | 55 | 39 | |
| 344 | 838M USD | 55 | 44 | |
| 355 | 68.2B JPY (≈$464M) | 54 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score