Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ESAB · against 482 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #336 of 483 · scores higher than 30% of peers · safety percentile 27
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)70 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including ESAB · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ESAB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 476 reported | 0.98× | 0.51× | 26% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 468 reported | 1.14 | 0.75 | 22% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 462 reported | 1.96× | 1.54× | 68% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.5B USD | 100 | 33 | |
| 2 | 5.7B USD | 99 | 36 | |
| 3 | 350.8B JPY (≈$2.4B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 4 | 28.9B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 5 | 2.45T CLP (≈$2.7B) | 99 | ||
| 332 | 579.7B JPY (≈$3.9B) | 28 | 49 | |
| 333 | 5.9B GBP (≈$7.7B) | 27 | 47 | |
| 334 | 2.8B GBP (≈$3.6B) | 27 | 57 | |
| 335 | 51.3B CNY (≈$7.2B) | 27 | 53 | |
| 336 | 4.7B USD | 27 | 40 | |
| 337 | 7.3B USD | 27 | 65 | |
| 338 | 1.07T JPY (≈$7.3B) | 26 | 40 | |
| 339 | 4.8B EUR (≈$5.3B) | 26 | 57 | |
| 340 | 371.7B JPY (≈$2.5B) | 26 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score