Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ESAB Corporation
How ESAB Corporation stacks up
ESAB · against 477 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
38/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #352 of 478 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score56 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including ESAB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 85% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -34.3% vs peer median 7.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.7% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 69% of peers. Revenue growth: 9.7% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ESAB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ESAB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 479 reported | 9.7% | 6.9% | 65% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 417 reported | -34.3% | 9.0% | 13% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 473 reported | 3.7% | 6.6% | 35% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ESAB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 5 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 352 | 1.07T JPY (≈$7.3B) | 38 | 57 | |
| 352 | 489.9B JPY (≈$3.3B) | 38 | 63 | |
| 352 | 3.9B USD | 38 | 20 | |
| 352 | 4.8B AUD (≈$3.1B) | 38 | 46 | |
| 352 | 4.7B USD | 38 | 40 | |
| 360 | 20.8B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 37 | 36 | |
| 360 | 1.36T JPY (≈$9.2B) | 37 | 70 | |
| 360 | 31.8B SEK (≈$3.2B) | 37 | 45 | |
| 360 | 25.5B SEK (≈$2.6B) | 37 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score