Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ero Copper Corp.
How Ero Copper Corp. stacks up
ERO · against 327 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #147 of 328 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score41 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including ERO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.4% vs peer median 2.6%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 85% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.7% vs peer median 8.5%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 91% of peers. Earnings yield: 8.7% vs peer median 3.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ERO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ERO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 324 reported | 12.2% | 4.7% | 92% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 332 reported | 17.5% | 9.9% | 86% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 93 reported | 5.4% | 3.9% | 63% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 316 reported | 29.5% | 55.4% | 25% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ERO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.73T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 57 | |
| 1 | 2.6B USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 3 | 69.8B ZAR (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 3 | 5.3B USD | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 4.7B AUD (≈$3.1B) | 98 | 87 | |
| 141 | 437.7B INR (≈$5.3B) | 62 | 63 | |
| 144 | 22.3B CNY (≈$3.1B) | 61 | 40 | |
| 144 | 377.5B JPY (≈$2.6B) | 61 | 48 | |
| 144 | 43.8B CNY (≈$6.1B) | 61 | 63 | |
| 147 | 3.2B USD | 60 | 64 | |
| 147 | 1.8B USD | 60 | 57 | |
| 149 | 22.9B CNY (≈$3.2B) | 59 | 62 | |
| 149 | 12.2B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 59 | 64 | |
| 149 | 14.2B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 59 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score