Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Energy Recovery, Inc.
How Energy Recovery, Inc. stacks up
ERII · against 770 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
63/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #286 of 771 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score59 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including ERII · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 63?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.2% vs peer median 3.8%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.4% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 84% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 10.5% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ERII, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ERII | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 766 reported | 3.6% | 2.7% | 55% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 782 reported | 8.4% | 6.4% | 59% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 174 reported | 10.5% | 3.6% | 76% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 773 reported | 47.0% | 57.7% | 37% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ERII| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 2.9B BRL (≈$517M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 284 | 298M CHF (≈$342M) | 64 | 23 | |
| 286 | 2.9B CNY (≈$401M) | 63 | 44 | |
| 286 | 16.5B TWD (≈$513M) | 63 | 67 | |
| 286 | 4.8B CNY (≈$666M) | 63 | 39 | |
| 286 | 366M USD | 63 | 62 | |
| 286 | 384M USD | 63 | 44 | |
| 286 | 590M EUR (≈$649M) | 63 | 43 | |
| 292 | 4.5B CNY (≈$624M) | 62 | 59 | |
| 292 | 7.8B TWD (≈$243M) | 62 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score