Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to EQT Corporation
How EQT Corporation stacks up
EQT · against 43 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
71/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #14 of 44 · scores higher than 67% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score7 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including EQT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 71?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 67% of peers. EBITDA yield: 17.1% vs peer median 12.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 68% of peers. Earnings yield: 8.0% vs peer median 5.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 77% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.1% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EQT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EQT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 46 reported | 7.9% | 6.8% | 60% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 43 reported | 16.2% | 13.9% | 60% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 32 reported | 11.1% | 6.1% | 87% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 41 reported | 74.4% | 50.7% | 78% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EQT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 229.8B NOK (≈$21.8B) | 89 | 55 | |
| 2 | 20.8B USD | 88 | 83 | |
| 2 | 1.96T INR (≈$23.5B) | 88 | 70 | |
| 4 | 2.92T INR (≈$35.0B) | 86 | 56 | |
| 5 | 3.73T JPY (≈$25.4B) | 84 | 63 | |
| 10 | 18.2B USD | 75 | 64 | |
| 10 | 32.3B EUR (≈$35.5B) | 75 | 59 | |
| 12 | 20.2B USD | 74 | 75 | |
| 13 | 23.8B EUR (≈$26.2B) | 72 | 54 | |
| 14 | 33.9B USD | 71 | 71 | |
| 14 | 1.15T THB (≈$32.1B) | 71 | 53 | |
| 16 | 17.6B USD | 65 | 31 | |
| 17 | 266.1B CNY (≈$37.3B) | 64 | 61 | |
| 18 | 56.7B USD | 63 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score