Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EPRX · against 435 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #278 of 436 · scores higher than 11% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score159 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including EPRX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | EPRX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 422 reported | -14.8% | 0.4% | 22% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 441 reported | -16.3% | 3.2% | 16% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 200 reported | -8.4% | -7.6% | 47% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 432 reported | 22.6% | 49.2% | 20% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 89.9B JPY (≈$611M) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 3.1B HKD (≈$396M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.50T IDR (≈$403M) | 99 | 69 | |
| 278 | 301M USD | 8 | ||
| 278 | 302M USD | 8 | 17 | |
| 278 | 530M USD | 8 | 23 | |
| 278 | 487M USD | 8 | 29 | |
| 278 | 455M USD | 8 | 36 | |
| 278 | 486M USD | 8 | 16 | |
| 278 | 551M USD | 8 | 27 | |
| 278 | 508M EUR (≈$559M) | 8 | 21 | |
| 278 | 660M USD | 8 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score