Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to EPR Properties
How EPR Properties stacks up
EPR · against 148 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #71 of 149 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score20 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including EPR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.8% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 76% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 45.6% vs peer median 11.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EPR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EPR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 149 reported | 4.5% | 5.8% | 42% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 129 reported | 45.6% | 11.1% | 80% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 147 reported | 2.8% | 7.5% | 29% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EPR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.60T CLP (≈$8.4B) | 99 | 86 | |
| 2 | 7.2B USD | 97 | 34 | |
| 2 | 4.9B EUR (≈$5.4B) | 97 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2.1B GBP (≈$2.7B) | 96 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.1B SGD (≈$3.1B) | 96 | 66 | |
| 66 | 6.2B USD | 62 | 63 | |
| 66 | 9.8B AUD (≈$6.5B) | 62 | 50 | |
| 66 | 5.5B EUR (≈$6.1B) | 62 | 73 | |
| 70 | 5.3B CAD (≈$3.8B) | 61 | 56 | |
| 71 | 4.6B USD | 60 | 57 | |
| 71 | 3.6B USD | 60 | 39 | |
| 71 | 7.4B USD | 60 | 53 | |
| 74 | 9.0B USD | 59 | 52 | |
| 74 | 1.9B GBP (≈$2.4B) | 59 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score