Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Edgewell Personal Care Company
How Edgewell Personal Care Company stacks up
EPC · against 236 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
20/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #194 of 237 · scores higher than 18% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score26 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including EPC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 20?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -7.2% vs peer median 4.5%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.1% vs peer median 6.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 69% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.7% vs peer median 8.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EPC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EPC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 227 reported | -3.3% | 4.5% | 10% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 238 reported | 12.1% | 9.5% | 67% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 86 reported | 4.1% | 7.8% | 32% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 223 reported | 113.4% | 58.8% | 87% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EPC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 2 | 87.0B INR (≈$1.0B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 2 | 29.73T IDR (≈$1.8B) | 98 | 60 | |
| 4 | 933M USD | 97 | 84 | |
| 5 | 945M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 96 | 60 | |
| 191 | 6.0B CNY (≈$835M) | 21 | 51 | |
| 191 | 14.3B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 21 | 26 | |
| 191 | 1.0B GBP (≈$1.3B) | 21 | 47 | |
| 194 | 9.0B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 20 | 57 | |
| 194 | 1.3B USD | 20 | 29 | |
| 196 | 11.2B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 18 | 19 | |
| 196 | 9.3B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 18 | 54 | |
| 198 | 2.74T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 17 | 49 | |
| 198 | 963M USD | 17 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score