Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to EPAM Systems, Inc.
How EPAM Systems, Inc. stacks up
EPAM · against 276 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
83/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #26 of 277 · scores higher than 90% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score23 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including EPAM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 83?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 78% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.6% vs peer median 2.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 78% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.8% vs peer median 2.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 86% of peers. EBITDA yield: 10.9% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EPAM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EPAM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 274 reported | 5.3% | 2.5% | 84% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 280 reported | 11.6% | 4.2% | 92% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 140 reported | 6.8% | 2.9% | 82% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 274 reported | 49.4% | 22.2% | 85% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EPAM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 1 | 40.9B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 3 | 31.1B HKD (≈$4.0B) | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 6.3B USD | 97 | 55 | |
| 5 | 46.1B HKD (≈$5.9B) | 94 | 59 | |
| 22 | 6.1B USD | 84 | 51 | |
| 22 | 12.9B USD | 84 | 53 | |
| 26 | 174.5B TWD (≈$5.4B) | 83 | 49 | |
| 26 | 7.6B USD | 83 | 55 | |
| 26 | 7.1B USD | 83 | 68 | |
| 29 | 28.4B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 82 | 59 | |
| 30 | 3.9B USD | 81 | 79 | |
| 30 | 4.4B USD | 81 | 45 | |
| 30 | 4.8B EUR (≈$5.3B) | 81 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score