Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EPAM · against 279 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #81 of 280 · scores higher than 71% of peers · safety percentile 64
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)25 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including EPAM · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity and current ratio, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EPAM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 271 reported | 0.04× | 0.32× | 80% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 264 reported | 1.39 | 1.04 | 27% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 278 reported | 2.75× | 1.78× | 72% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 2 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 4 | 625.8B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 5 | 27.4B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 65 | |
| 77 | 641.0B JPY (≈$4.4B) | 66 | 70 | |
| 78 | 4.0B USD | 65 | 84 | |
| 79 | 913.1B INR (≈$11.0B) | 65 | 69 | |
| 80 | 3.7B USD | 65 | 38 | |
| 81 | 7.1B USD | 64 | 68 | |
| 82 | 5.3B CAD (≈$3.8B) | 64 | 65 | |
| 83 | 53.0B CNY (≈$7.4B) | 64 | 50 | |
| 84 | 40.2B CNY (≈$5.6B) | 64 | 43 | |
| 85 | 76.3B CNY (≈$10.7B) | 63 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score