Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
How Enerpac Tool Group Corp. stacks up
EPAC · against 657 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #365 of 658 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score79 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including EPAC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.5% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.3% vs peer median 4.4%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 10.5% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EPAC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EPAC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 662 reported | 4.3% | 5.5% | 46% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 555 reported | 10.5% | 7.3% | 55% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 654 reported | 2.5% | 5.0% | 39% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EPAC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 5 | 14.6B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 62 | |
| 365 | 12.5B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 47 | 64 | |
| 365 | 231.8B JPY (≈$1.6B) | 47 | 79 | |
| 365 | 66.7B TRY (≈$2.0B) | 47 | 56 | |
| 365 | 4.1B USD | 47 | 24 | |
| 365 | 2.2B USD | 47 | 65 | |
| 365 | 130.4B INR (≈$1.6B) | 47 | 64 | |
| 365 | 1.9B CHF (≈$2.2B) | 47 | 54 | |
| 365 | 4.3B USD | 47 | 64 | |
| 365 | 1.7B USD | 47 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score