Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Entegris, Inc.
How Entegris, Inc. stacks up
ENTG · against 478 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Growth
29/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #405 of 479 · scores higher than 15% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score37 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including ENTG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 29?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 78% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -4.0% vs peer median 4.8%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 65% of peers. Revenue growth: 3.2% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 2.6% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ENTG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ENTG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 3.2% | 13.1% | 20% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 286 reported | 2.6% | 22.4% | 31% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | -4.0% | 9.7% | 14% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ENTG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 965.7B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 400 | 408M USD | 31 | 47 | |
| 400 | 1.4B USD | 31 | 35 | |
| 403 | 1.3B USD | 30 | 37 | |
| 403 | 1.1B USD | 30 | 46 | |
| 405 | 23.3B USD | 29 | 39 | |
| 405 | 4.4B USD | 29 | 45 | |
| 405 | 1.4B USD | 29 | 32 | |
| 405 | 6.4B USD | 29 | 47 | |
| 409 | 1.3B USD | 28 | 74 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score